I've led 400+ hires. Now I help companies make better hiring decisions before they commit.

Across every step of hiring, I help you make the call that holds up: the decision, the scope, the search, and the systems behind them.

400+
Hires led
320+
In regulated industries
96%
Offer acceptance rate
4+ ATS
Configured, integrated, or implemented

What I actually do

Kate Rose

Sometimes companies have a hiring problem. More often, they have a decision problem that shows up as a hiring problem.

I'm Kate Rose, formerly Smithson. I've spent nearly a decade in talent acquisition across agency, in-house, and leadership roles, with deep experience in GTM hiring (sales, marketing, legal, finance, and customer-facing leadership for companies scaling revenue). On the agency side, I ran searches for 100+ clients across technical, product, and specialized roles including electrical engineers and hardware engineers. Most recently, Head of Talent Acquisition at SCA Pharma, a PE-backed 600-person 503B outsourcing facility under FDA oversight, where I built the talent function from the ground up and led hiring across Clinical, Sales, Legal, Finance, Engineering, and Leadership. Before that, I led go-to-market talent at Redox, a VC-backed healthtech company, and delivered 75+ hires including doubling the sales team.

I build process, coach teams, help founders and leaders make better calls on who to hire, and set up the systems that make it repeatable, from kickoff to ATS selection and setup.

I also bring technical implementation experience that goes beyond TA. I've worked directly with regulated data through APIs and JSON, used AI-assisted workflows in my own work, and integrated AI data across systems. When a problem spans hiring and the systems around it, I can hold both.

I'd rather take longer to make the right hire than hit a deadline with the wrong one. That said, when I joined Redox I cut sales time-to-hire from 57 days to 20. The work I do usually makes hiring faster over time, not slower, because most of the slowness comes from shifting searches once gaps in the original scope surface. In regulated environments, a bad executive hire costs 2-3x the role's salary when you factor in failure risk. Speed matters. Speed at the expense of quality is what gets companies into trouble.

The common thread across everything I work on: regulated or complex environments where hiring mistakes cost more because the talent pool is narrower and the stakes are higher. The systems behind hiring (ATS, HRIS, data pipelines, AI workflows) have to be built deliberately, not bolted on.

Industry depth
SaaS startups, healthtech, 503B pharma under FDA oversight, government, Fortune 500, PE-backed and VC-backed
Company stage
Pre-revenue through Fortune 500, including PE-backed and VC-backed from Seed to Series D
Role focus
GTM, legal, and technical roles, leadership, regulated-industry hires
Credentials
PHR · Lean Six Sigma Green Belt · HL7/HealthIT Interoperability · Workday Human Capital Management for Business Users

Ways to work together

A few ways to work together, priced so incentives stay aligned with quality hires, not speed to fill.

Not sure which engagement fits? Book a free 30-minute call. By the end of it you will know exactly what makes sense, or whether it does not.

Book a free call
Pricing
Flat-rate. Transparent. No contingency, no commission, no surprise invoices. You know what you're paying and what you're getting, before we start.

If you are not sure whether an engagement is the right fit, this is where most people start. Bring one decision. Ninety minutes. You will leave with a clear answer, and a sense of whether ongoing work makes sense.

A single hiring decision can represent a $300K to $700K commitment when you factor in salary, ramp, and risk.

This is the review before that commitment.

Don't see an arrangement that quite fits? Engagements and fees can be tailored to specific situations. Email Kate to scope something custom.

Hiring decisions this helps with

Use this when the real question is not just who to hire, but whether the role, timing, and path make sense.

  1. Should we hire this role now or wait 3 to 6 months?
  2. Is this role scoped correctly or trying to do too much?
  3. Should this be a full-time hire, contractor, fractional, or agency search?
  4. Are we solving the right problem with this hire?
  5. We are down to finalists. Is this actually the right hire?
  6. Guidance on making and negotiating an offer once you have the right candidate.
  7. Evaluating or implementing recruiting tools, AI workflows, or employer branding programs.

What this often changes

Before"We need to hire immediately."
After"We delayed the hire and avoided a mis-scoped role."
Before"This must be full-time."
After"Solved with a contractor with lower cost and faster ramp."
Before"We're going with an agency."
After"Filled it internally in less time for a fraction of the cost."

Ground rules

These protect both of us. I do my best work when the scope is clear and expectations are set up front.

Commitment terms vary by engagement. Retainers have a 3-month minimum, then either side can end with 30 days notice. Role Rescue and Talent Systems Manager run month-to-month from day one. Career Coaching and Decision Review are one-session bookings — pay at checkout, show up, done.

01
Scope set on day one. If the work shifts meaningfully, we talk and adjust.
02
US business hours. Async-friendly.
03
Strategic work first. The goal is clarity and quality, not speed for its own sake.
04
If I am not the right fit, I will say so.

What the intake call is and isn't

The intake call is how we decide whether an ongoing engagement makes sense. Decision Review is self-serve: book, pay, and bring one decision.

The Fractional Head of Talent and Talent Systems Manager engagements start with a 30-minute intake call. It is free, but it is not a sales call and not a working session. Role Rescue is self-serve, no intake call required.

01
Free, remote, and takes 30 minutes. No prework required on your end.
02
Bring the specific problem. Team and company context help. The specific problem is what we'll work from.
03
We're evaluating fit, not solving the problem. Working through the decision itself is what the paid engagements are for.
04
You leave with a clear answer. By the end of the call I'll tell you if I'm the right fit and which engagement applies.

From people who have partnered with me

More reviews available on LinkedIn. Worked with Kate? Leave a review →

Career coaching

If you're an individual navigating a job search, an offer, or a career transition, that's a different conversation.

Career coaching for sales, GTM, project managers, and software engineers lives on its own page. Same person, different audience.

See career coaching →

If this sounds like your situation, let's talk.

Send me a note with the decision, role, or hiring problem you are working through. I'll tell you whether I'm the right fit.

Two ways to reach me

Email: [email protected]
Book a 30-min intake call: calendar link →

Review a hiring decision Send a note