I help companies make high-stakes hires and build the systems that make good hiring repeatable.

I've led 400+ hires in regulated and complex environments. Companies bring me one decision, a systems build, a leadership search, or the whole talent function.

When hiring systems are slowing recruiters down, obscuring what’s happening, or making every search harder than it should be, I help fix the underlying problem.

9+
ATS, HRIS & recruiting platforms implemented, configured, or integrated
400+
Hires led
340+
Hires in regulated industries
96%
Offer acceptance rate

Ways to work together

Four ways in, depending on what you need right now. All of them have clear terms before work begins.

Architect
Talent Systems Architecture & Advisory. Diagnose what is not working, design the future state, and create the roadmap to get there.
Engineer
AI Talent Engineer. AI workflows, automations, integrations, and the checks that catch where AI is confidently wrong.
Search
Executive & Specialized Search. Leadership seats and business-critical roles, run end to end.
Lead
Fractional Head of Talent. Senior talent leadership inside your company, without the full-time hire.

Not sure which one fits? Book a free 30-minute call. By the end, you'll know whether there's a fit and what the recommended next step is. What the call is and isn't ↓

Book a free call
Rates and terms
Clear terms before work begins. Engagement structures and terms are on the pricing page. Fees are quoted on the intake call and confirmed in writing before work starts.

Don't see an arrangement that quite fits? Scope and fees can be tailored to specific situations. Email Kate to scope something custom.

What this fixes

01
Selecting or implementing a first ATS without an internal recruiting-systems owner to architect the setup.
02
Your recruiters are spending hours troubleshooting the ATS instead of filling roles.
03
ATS or recruiting workflows that no longer match how the organization actually operates.
04
Multiple companies, brands, or business units that need to work differently inside one recruiting system.
05
AI pilots or ideas that need to become repeatable recruiting workflows.

What this has looked like in practice

Built TA from the ground up

Built the recruiting function, including process, sourcing strategy, agency model, interview structure, reporting, and systems, while leading a team supporting high-volume nonexempt manufacturing hiring. Personally focused on specialized exempt manufacturing searches.

57 → 20 days

Sales time-to-hire reduced

Reduced sales time-to-hire from 57 days to 20 while improving the operating process behind hiring, not just the speed of individual searches.

Who you're working with

Kate Rose

Sometimes companies have a hiring problem. More often, they have a decision problem that shows up as a hiring problem.

I'm Kate Rose. Nearly a decade in talent acquisition across agency, in-house, and leadership roles: 100+ client searches on the agency side, go-to-market talent at Redox, a VC-backed healthtech company, where I cut sales time-to-hire from 57 days to 20 and delivered 75+ hires, and most recently Head of Talent Acquisition at SCA Pharma, a PE-backed 600-person 503B facility under FDA oversight, where I built the talent function from the ground up. That experience also includes creating and leading a candidate experience committee at a SaaS startup.

My systems experience is hands-on. I've configured and integrated ATS and HRIS platforms, worked with regulated data through APIs and JSON, and built AI-assisted workflows with the checks that catch where they're confidently wrong. When a problem spans hiring and the systems around it, I can hold both.

The common thread is regulated or complex environments where hiring mistakes cost more because the talent pool is narrower and the stakes are higher. If you think of this as HR, you're mostly right: it's the talent and hiring side of HR and the systems it runs on, not payroll, benefits, or employee relations. When you need those, I'll point you to people who do them well.

Industry depth
SaaS startups, healthtech, 503B pharma under FDA oversight, government, Fortune 500, M&A integrations, and PE-backed and VC-backed companies
Company stage
Pre-revenue through Fortune 500, including PE-backed and VC-backed from Seed to Series D
Role focus
GTM, legal, and technical roles, leadership, regulated-industry hires
Credentials
PHR · Lean Six Sigma Green Belt · HL7/HealthIT Interoperability · Workday Human Capital Management for Business Users

What the work changes

The work should leave something behind: a hiring system your team can run and better decisions when the stakes are high.

Systems that make hiring repeatable

01
Systems built around how your team works. You get stages, scorecards, and automations configured around your process, not factory defaults.
02
Clearer definitions and more reliable operational visibility. You get cleaner data capture, clearer definitions, and an honest view of what the system can show versus what still depends on process and adoption.
03
A hiring process that is easier to run. You get clearer ownership, fewer handoff gaps, and workflows that keep candidates and hiring teams moving.

Decisions and searches that hold up

01
You open better-defined roles. Scope, level, and success criteria are settled before candidates are in process.
02
Your interview panel works from the same bar. Everyone evaluates the same role against the same success criteria.
03
You make finalist decisions on evidence. You get a structured read on the finalist, not a gut call under deadline pressure.
04
Your leadership search stays managed through close, from scoping through a signed offer.

What the intake call is and isn't

Every engagement above, from a systems architecture project to a leadership search to the fractional retainer, starts with the same free 30-minute intake call.

01
Free, remote, and 30 minutes. No prework required.
02
Bring the specific role, search, decision, or systems problem you are working through.
03
By the end of the call, I'll tell you whether I'm the right fit and what I'd recommend as the next step.

Ground rules

Commitment terms vary by engagement. Retainers have a 3-month minimum, then either side can end with 30 days notice. Talent Systems Architecture & Advisory and AI Talent Engineer run month-to-month from day one, delivered in scheduled working blocks. Executive & Specialized Search is engaged and scoped per role, with the fee structure agreed before work starts.

01
Scope set on day one. If the work shifts meaningfully, we talk and adjust.
02
US business hours. Async-friendly.
03
Strategic work first. The goal is clarity and quality, not speed for its own sake.
04
If I am not the right fit, I will say so.

For larger engagements, Relio may bring in trusted specialists for systems support, sourcing, research, documentation, implementation, or other areas of expertise. The delivery team and responsibilities are agreed before work begins, with Relio maintaining responsibility for the engagement and quality of the work.

From people who have partnered with me

More reviews available on LinkedIn. Worked with Kate? Leave a review →

If this sounds like your situation, let's talk.

Send me the role, search, decision, or systems problem you're working through. I'll tell you whether I'm the right fit and what I'd recommend next.

Relio keeps consulting capacity intentionally limited so engagements stay senior-led and close to the work.

Two ways to reach me

Email: kate@relioengine.com
Book a 30-min intake call: calendar link →

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙