I've led 400+ hires in regulated and complex environments. Companies bring me one decision, a systems build, a leadership search, or the whole talent function.
Four ways in, depending on what you need right now. Every engagement has clear pricing before work begins.
Not sure which engagement fits? Book a free 30-minute call. By the end, you'll know whether there's a fit and what the recommended next step is. What the call is and isn't ↓
Book a free callIf you are not sure whether an engagement is the right fit, this is where most people start. Bring one decision. Ninety minutes. You will leave with a clear recommendation and next step, plus a sense of whether ongoing work makes sense.
A structured evaluation of a single hiring decision before you commit: open the role, wait, restructure it, or fill it a different way.
Best for:
A single hiring decision can represent a $300K to $700K commitment when you factor in salary, ramp, and risk.
This is the review before that commitment.
Hands-on setup, integration, and configuration of the systems your hiring runs on: ATS, HRIS, reporting dashboards, candidate workflows, and scorecards.
Systems worked with: Greenhouse, Lever, SmartRecruiters, JazzHR, Bullhorn, and Paylocity, plus LinkedIn Recruiter System Connect, Indeed, and Criteria. Other systems can be in scope on request.
Best for: Teams standing up a new ATS or HRIS, mid-implementation projects that have stalled, or hiring ops that have grown without intentional configuration.
The AI layer your hiring runs on, designed around how you actually hire: strategy and roadmap, system integrations and automations, reusable workflows and Skills your team can run without me, and the review checkpoints that catch confident but wrong output before it reaches a candidate or a hiring manager.
Best for: Teams piloting or scaling AI in hiring who want it built on purpose, and founders who need leverage before a full internal team.
A dedicated search for senior manager roles and above, run end to end. I scope the role with your leadership team, map the market, build a calibrated shortlist, prepare the interview panel, and manage the offer through close. You make the final call with real evidence behind it.
Best for: Senior manager through C-level seats, first leadership hires in a function, and regulated environments where the wrong hire is expensive to unwind.
Senior talent leadership inside your company. I support high-stakes hiring while building the systems, sourcing structure, and operational foundation recruiting needs to scale, then prepare the handoff to a full-time internal talent leader when the time is right.
Best for: Seed through Series D startups, or PE-backed companies in the first 6 to 12 months post-investment, where hiring quality is governance, not throughput.
Don't see an arrangement that quite fits? Engagements and fees can be tailored to specific situations. Email Kate to scope something custom.
Decision Review is self-serve: book, pay, and bring one decision. Every other engagement above, from a systems build to an executive search to the fractional retainer, starts with the same free 30-minute intake call.
Two kinds of results: systems your team runs every week, and decisions that hold up under pressure.
Current work in this lane: a 13-week end-to-end ATS reconfiguration for a multi-entity industrial manufacturer. A subsidiary is already consolidated off its separate ATS ahead of schedule, with LinkedIn, Indeed, assessment, and payroll integrations underway.
These protect both of us. I do my best work when the scope is clear and expectations are set up front.
Commitment terms vary by engagement. Retainers have a 3-month minimum, then either side can end with 30 days notice. Talent Systems Manager and AI Talent Engineer run month-to-month from day one. Leadership & Executive Search is scoped and quoted per search. Career Coaching and Decision Review are one-session bookings, pay at checkout, show up, done.
For larger engagements, Relio may bring in trusted specialists for sourcing, systems support, documentation, or implementation work while Kate remains the primary strategy and delivery lead.
Sometimes companies have a hiring problem. More often, they have a decision problem that shows up as a hiring problem.
I'm Kate Rose, formerly Smithson. Nearly a decade in talent acquisition across agency, in-house, and leadership roles: 100+ client searches on the agency side, go-to-market talent at Redox, a VC-backed healthtech company, where I cut sales time-to-hire from 57 days to 20 and delivered 75+ hires, and most recently Head of Talent Acquisition at SCA Pharma, a PE-backed 600-person 503B facility under FDA oversight, where I built the talent function from the ground up.
My systems experience is hands-on. I've configured and integrated ATS and HRIS platforms, worked with regulated data through APIs and JSON, and built AI-assisted workflows with the checks that catch where they're confidently wrong. When a problem spans hiring and the systems around it, I can hold both.
The common thread is regulated or complex environments where hiring mistakes cost more because the talent pool is narrower and the stakes are higher. If you think of this as HR, you're mostly right: it's the talent and hiring side of HR and the systems it runs on, not payroll, benefits, or employee relations. When you need those, I'll point you to people who do them well.
David Millsaps · Marketing AI for Healthcare
If you're an individual navigating a job search, an offer, or a career transition, that's a different conversation.
Career coaching for sales, GTM, project managers, and software engineers lives on its own page. Same person, different audience.
Send me a note with the decision, role, or systems problem you are working through. I'll tell you whether I'm the right fit.
Email: [email protected]
Book a 30-min intake call: calendar link →